H
HITL Score// audit.AI · v4.2
// live · auditing AI for drift · 2026 Q2

What's your Human-in-the-Loop / Score?

AI is making hiring decisions, denying loans, and flagging employees for termination — with no meaningful human oversight. Regulators are coming. Fines are real. We score your exposure before they do.

// referenced.in
CNBC · Forbes · UCLA Law · Loyola Law · ABA
// SPECIMEN.CERT.0001
Acme Corp · 2026-Q2
73/100
Moderate · Active Liability
DOC · HITL-EXP-2026-Q2
10110100 · 11001010 · 00101001
An empty boardroom at dusk — the room someone was supposed to be in.
// human-in-the-loop, or just the loop? When the room is empty, the AI is the decision-maker — whether your compliance docs say so or not.
// row.001
A Specimen Score Report

What a real HITL Score actually looks like.

// SPECIMEN.0001

HITL Score · 0–100

73/100
Moderate · Active Liability
Critical 0-40 Moderate 41-70 Compliant 71-100
// top.line.metrics

Override behavior runs 34%, but cognitive load drags review time to 2.3s — a rubber stamp with a heartbeat.

34%
Override
2.3s
Review
91%
Escalation
// notes

40+ metrics across 6 dimensions.

What you see here is one facet. What your General Counsel will see is the whole instrument — bias-audit-grade, regulator-defensible, sealed.

CERT · HITL-EXP-2026-Q2
10110100 · 11001010
00101001 · 11000010
// row.002
Expert Commentary · Forbes Business Council

Charles Lew on what we're actually building.

// source
Forbes · Business Council
Authored by Charles Lew, Esq.

"Ghosted by the Machine: When AI Decides You're Not Worth Interviewing."

How AI screening tools are rejecting qualified candidates at scale — with zero human review, zero accountability, and zero legal compliance. This piece — published in Forbes — is the conceptual backbone of HITL Score's methodology, and a starting point for understanding what your AI systems are actually doing on your behalf.

Read the full Forbes article →
// row.003
Key Statistics · The Exposure Reality

The cost of doing nothing is no longer theoretical.

// résumés.unseen
99%
0110 0011 · 0x63
of AI-rejected résumés never seen by a human reviewer.
// employers.using.AI
83%
0101 0011 · 0x53
of employers using AI in hiring as of 2025. Number is growing.
// federal.audit.laws
0
0000 0000 · 0x00
federal laws requiring AI hiring audits in the United States.
// EU_AI_Act.max
35M
1000 1011 · 0x8B
per violation under the EU AI Act. 7% of global revenue ceiling.
// NYC_LL_144.daily
$1,500
1011 1100 · 0xBC
per violation per day under New York City Local Law 144.
// states.AI.bills.2025
45+
0010 1101 · 0x2D
U.S. states introduced AI legislation during 2025.
// IL_AIVI.violation
$1,000
0011 1110 · 0x3E
per violation under the Illinois AI Video Interview Act.
// fully.compliant
000
0000 0000 · 0x00
U.S. companies fully HITL-compliant by our measure today.
// row.004
The Problem

Your AI is making decisions. Nobody's watching.

[ i. ] Ghosted by the Machine

Ghosted by the Machine

Your AI screening tool rejected 10,000 applicants last month. How many did a human actually review? If the answer is "none" — and for most companies it is — you're already in violation.

[ ii. ] The 2-Second "Review"

The 2-Second "Review."

Average human review time for AI-generated hiring decisions: 2.3 seconds. That's not human-in-the-loop. That's a rubber stamp with a heartbeat. Regulators will see right through it.

[ iii. ] The $35M Question

The $35M Question.

EU AI Act: up to €35M per violation. NYC: $1,500 per violation per day. Colorado: AG enforcement plus private right of action. Illinois: $1,000 per violation. The fines stack. The lawsuits are coming.

// row.005
Who's Already Exposed

It's not hypothetical. It's already happening.

An empty corporate waiting room with rows of chairs.
// case.001 · Workday
Active Litigation

Workday Class Action (2024)

Applicants filed a class action alleging Workday's AI screening tools discriminated based on race, age, and disability — rejecting qualified candidates at scale with no human review.

A $365,000 settlement check on a dark wood desk.
// case.002 · iTutorGroup
Settled · $365K

iTutorGroup EEOC Settlement

$365K settlement after the EEOC found iTutorGroup's AI recruiting software automatically rejected applicants over 55. The algorithm encoded age discrimination — and nobody was watching.

A dimmed monitor with a webcam mounted on top — the eye that was watching has been turned off.
// case.003 · HireVue
Feature Dropped

HireVue Facial Analysis

After backlash from AI researchers and civil rights groups, HireVue dropped facial analysis from its video interview AI. The reputational damage was already done.

// row.006
The HITL Score Methodology · vi. dimensions · xl. metrics

Six dimensions. Forty metrics. One number that matters.

We don't check boxes. We measure whether your human oversight is real — or performance. Every score maps directly to active regulatory requirements.

i. // 0001
25%
Decision Custody
Who actually holds the decision? We trace the chain from AI recommendation to final action. If no human can override, you score zero.
0001 1001₂
ii. // 0010
20%
Override Analysis
If humans never override the AI, they're not in the loop. We measure override rates, patterns, and whether overrides are even technically possible.
0001 0100₂
iii. // 0011
20%
Cognitive Load
A human reviewing 500 decisions per hour can't meaningfully evaluate any of them. We measure review time, complexity ratios, and alert fatigue indicators.
0001 0100₂
iv. // 0100
15%
Escalation Integrity
When the AI flags uncertainty, does a human actually see it? We audit escalation protocols, response times, and resolution quality.
0000 1111₂
v. // 0101
10%
Bias Detection
Statistical analysis of AI outputs across protected classes. Disparate impact testing. Selection rate analysis per NYC LL 144 standards.
0000 1010₂
vi. // 0110
10%
Documentation & Audit Trail
Can you prove compliance to a regulator tomorrow? We assess logging, record retention, and whether your documentation survives legal scrutiny.
0000 1010₂
// row.007
Regulatory Landscape · Active Jurisdictions

The fines are real. The deadlines are now.

AI governance legislation is accelerating faster than any compliance framework in history. Here's what's already active.

A federal courthouse façade at dawn, dark stormy sky breaking with amber light.
// federal · state · supranational
// jur
regulation
penalty
status
EU
EU AI ActConformity assessment · bias testing · oversight documentation. Prohibited practices in force since Feb 2025.
€35M / 7% rev
Enforcing
NYC
Local Law 144Independent bias audit required for automated employment decision tools. Hiring · promotion · termination.
$1,500 / day
Enforcing
CO
Colorado SB 21-205First comprehensive state AI law. Impact assessments, risk management, human oversight required.
AG + private right
Feb 2026
CA
CA AB 2013 + PendingTraining data disclosure. Pending bills targeting automated decisions in housing, employment, finance.
Civil + admin
Expanding
IL
AI Video Interview ActEmployers using AI to analyze video interviews must notify candidates, explain function, obtain consent.
$1,000 / violation
Enforcing
FED
NIST AI RMF + EONIST framework becoming de facto standard. Federal contractors must demonstrate AI governance.
Contract loss
Accelerating
// row.008
What Happens Without a HITL Score

The cost of doing nothing.

An empty office cubicle late at night, the screen showing rows of rejected applications.
// year.001 · the quiet exposure
Y1

The Quiet Exposure

Your AI screening tool rejects 50,000 applicants. Zero bias audits. Zero HITL documentation. You don't know you're exposed because nobody's measuring. The liability accrues silently — $1,500/violation/day in NYC alone.

$27M+ accumulated liability
An empty courtroom with the plaintiff's file open on the table.
// year.002 · the class action
Y2

The Class Action

A rejected applicant files an EEOC complaint. Discovery reveals your AI had a 34% adverse impact on protected classes. Your "human in the loop" was a manager clicking "approve all" every morning. Plaintiffs' attorneys smell blood.

$50M+ avg AI discrimination settlement
A crumpled newspaper on a wet sidewalk, the headline reading 'AI HIRING SCANDAL'.
// year.003 · the front page
Y3

The Front Page

Reuters runs the story: "Company X used AI to screen out minority candidates for 3 years with no human oversight." Stock drops 12%. CHRO resigns. Congressional hearing subpoena arrives. Brand reputation — unrecoverable.

Priceless reputational damage
Get Your Score Before It's Too Late →
// row.009
Founder Credibility

Built by practitioners who saw this coming.

Portrait of Charles Lew, Esq.
Charles Lew, Esq. Forbes Business Council · Loyola Law Board · LA Small Business Commissioner

HITL Score was authored by Charles Lew, Esq. — a Forbes Business Council member since 2018, faculty at Loyola Law School, and one of the first U.S. legal scholars to teach a course on Law & the Metaverse. The methodology has been refined across six dimensions and forty-plus compliance metrics, with regulatory mapping reviewed by practitioners who have argued AI compliance cases in active litigation.

Forbes
Business Council, since 2018
Loyola Law
School Board of Directors
City of Los Angeles
Small Business Commissioner
First in US
Law & Metaverse Course
// dimensions
6 weighted compliance dimensions
// metrics
40+ defensible metrics
// row.010
Quick Self-Assessment · 60 seconds

Estimate your HITL Score in 60 seconds.

Answer 5 yes/no questions to get a rough estimate of where you stand. This isn't a substitute for a full assessment — but it'll tell you if you should be worried.

A vintage chrome chronograph stopwatch — 60 seconds.
// quick.assess.5q

Five questions. One rough number.

Click yes/no for each. Final estimate updates live at the bottom.

01
Do humans review every AI-generated hiring/screening decision?
02
Can humans override AI recommendations in your system?
03
Is the average review time per decision more than 30 seconds?
04
Do you have documented escalation procedures for AI flags?
05
Have you conducted a bias audit in the last 12 months?
// estimated.range
— / 100

This is a rough estimate. A full HITL Score assessment evaluates 40+ metrics across 6 dimensions and is regulator-defensible.

Get Full Score →
// row.011
Enterprise Licensing

Don't hire us. License the standard.

The HITL Score methodology is available for licensing by consulting firms, law firms, and GRC platforms who want to offer AI compliance scoring under their own brand.

// license.tier.001 · consulting

Consulting Firms

Big 4 and management consultancies: add HITL Score to your AI advisory practice. Certified methodology, training, and co-branded deliverables. Scale AI governance across your client portfolio.

Inquire About Consulting License →
// license.tier.002 · law.firms

Law Firms

Am Law 100 and boutique tech firms: offer HITL Score assessments as part of AI compliance engagements. Defensible methodology backed by regulatory mapping. Differentiate your practice.

Inquire About Firm License →
// license.tier.003 · GRC.platforms

GRC Platforms

Embed HITL Score directly into your governance, risk, and compliance software. API access, scoring engine integration, and continuous monitoring modules. Make HITL Score native to your platform.

Inquire About Platform License →
// row.012
Engagement Models · Get Scored. Get Compliant. Stay Compliant.

From a single-system scan to enterprise-wide certification.

Whether you need a single AI system scored or organization-wide HITL certification, we scale to your risk profile.

// tier
engagement
price
action
T-I
HITL Quick Scan
2-hour deep dive · one workflow analyzed · top 3 gaps · 48-hour exec summary.
  • 2-hour consultation
  • One AI workflow analyzed
  • Risk exposure snapshot
  • Priority remediation recs
$2,500
T-III
Full Compliance Audit // enterprise
All systems scored · EU AI Act mapping · state-by-state matrix · board package · 90-day plan.
  • All AI systems inventoried
  • EU AI Act conformity mapping
  • State-by-state matrix
  • Board presentation package
  • C-suite briefing
$35K– $75K
T-IV
Continuous Monitoring // ongoing
Quarterly re-scoring · regulatory tracking · pre-deployment scores · annual board briefing.
  • Quarterly re-scoring
  • Regulatory change tracking
  • Pre-deployment scoring
  • Dedicated compliance advisor
  • Annual board briefing
$5K– $15K / mo
pull.quote.001
Millions of people are being ghosted by machines — rejected by algorithms that no human ever reviewed, governed by laws that don't exist yet, with consequences that are already irreversible. The absence of accountability isn't a bug. It's the design. We built HITL Score to change that.
Charles Lew, Esq.
Forbes Business Council · LA Small Business Commissioner · Loyola Law School Board
// row.999
Petition for Assessment

The fines are accruing. The lawsuits are being drafted. What's your score?

Free 30-minute exposure assessment. We'll tell you exactly how many of your AI systems are legally non-compliant, what your HITL Score is today, and what it'll cost to fix it — before a regulator tells you first.

No obligation. No spam. We respond within one business day. Confidentiality assured under attorney-client privilege upon engagement.

A signed legal document with an embossed gold notary seal.

// petition.run()

Get Your Free HITL Score Assessment